Tim Parkes and Mark Mourier faced 13 counts of bank fraud, with Parkes facing an additional charge of giving false information to investigators when he claimed the “shell” companies used in the alleged fraud were legitimate companies.
Deliberations began
Tuesday morning after the week-long bank fraud case of the Remington duo whose
actions, along with former Benton Bank president Jimmy Goddard, allegedly
brought about the end of Benton Banking Company in 2007. Goddard, who pleaded
guilty in March, was expected to be the government’s star witness but was not
called to testify.
Tim Parkes and Mark Mourier
faced 13 counts of bank fraud, with Parkes facing an additional charge of
giving false information to investigators when he claimed the “shell” companies
used in the alleged fraud were legitimate companies. Assistant US Attorney Gary
Humble told jurors that Parkes and Mourier, through their company Remington
Industries, accumulated loans they could not repay and used bogus LLCs (Limited
Liability Companies) to deceive bank regulators about how much money had been
lent to them. The defense claimed that the LLCs were legitimate companies and
blamed Goddard for the alleged fraud.
Assistant US Attorney Gary Humble called
only three witnesses: Jennifer Speights, Joe Waters and FBI Special Agent Scott
Barker. Waters, manager of the Benton branch of what is now First Volunteer
Bank, remained on the stand for two days.
According to his
testimony, Waters signed two letters of credit for Remington Industries, one
for $1.75 million in December of 2001 and one for $500,000 in February of 2002,
“because the boss told me to.” The letters of credit provided backing for loans
for Remington from The Livingston Group. Waters indicated he believed part of
the need for the $500,000 was because Frontier Bank was threatening to call in
a note Remington had there and that would cause Livingston to call in their
note.
Waters said he had no
reason to question Goddard when told to sign the letters of credit. He said there
were lending limits in place at the bank but Goddard was in charge of the
lending issues.
Waters said Remington
already had a $1.6 million line of credit at the bank and the bank was backing
a million dollar USDA loan. He said Remington was also having major cash flow
issues, carrying as much as a negative $1.18 million in their checking account
and incurring more than 200 overdraft fees per month between Sept., 2001 and
February, 2003. He said the bulk of the money being loaned to Remington from
The Livingston Group was to be paid to Benton Bank to cover the negative
balance in Remington’s checking account and pay down their other loans.
In October, 2002, The Livingston Group
called in the notes guaranteed by the letters of credit. Waters said he did not
know Livingston had come to the bank demanding payment or that Goddard had
given them a cashier’s check. He said once Goddard left the bank in 2007, there
was a tangled web of transactions and it took them a while to figure out where
all the money went.
Waters said the day after Goddard wrote the
$2.25 million check to Livingston, Parkes and Mourier each signed personal
notes for $1.125 million, and that no security or collateral was found for
either of the notes. He said an email found in Goddard’s office titled “C-corp
names” listed the names of 10 LLCs and had handwritten notations from Goddard
as to the amount loaned to each company. They added up to the $2.25 million
paid to Livingston and covered the $1.125 million notes to Parkes and Mourier.
Waters said there were no paper files for
loans to the 10 LLCs, but they were able to find the microfilm copies of the
loans. He said one of the LLCs, Automotive Coordinates, had a checking account
and that $18,000 per month in interest was being paid on the 10 loans from that
account.
The Automotive Coordinates account showed
two deposits, one for $185,000 in February, 2003, and one for $192,000 in
March, 2003, when the loans were initially set up. Waters said another 11 LLCs
were eventually set up, totaling about $4 million owed to the bank. He said the
bank was eventually forced by the FDIC to write-off the loans as bad loans.
Special Agent Scott Barker provided a
timeline. He said an email sent to attorney Kent Moore, who helped Parkes set
up the LLCs, was dated December, 2002, two months after the loans were made. He
said Remington was overdrafted $1.18 million according to their January, 2003
bank statement. He said debit tickets in the bank showed a deposit amount equal
to the money loaned to the LLCs, and the money went into the Automotive
Coordinates account.
Barker said another email, dated September, 2004,
was sent from Goddard to Parkes regarding deposits and drafts from an account
for Harris Components, which had established its own $190,000 line of credit.
The email said, in part, “you might want to consider a personal loan since the
company is out of business.” Barker said a line of credit had been signed for
Harris Components by Mourier earlier in 2004.
An email from Goddard in November, 2005,
told Parkes that the bank was scheduled for an exam sometime after the
beginning of the year and asked for an update on the status of a refinance
through AmSouth bank.
Barker also testified Parkes told him all
21 of the LLCs were working, viable companies. Barker said Mourier told him
they were “shell” companies set up to hide loans.
Testifying for the defense, Greg Swyers,
who worked off and on for Remington for 18 years, said they started off as
CanMark Industries (a name used on one of the LLC loans) in Toronto and began
operations in Delano in 1985. He said they obtained their first mortgage from
Benton Bank and that things were initially going well, but a change to a
different type of manufacturing process for the floor mats, an EVA line, caused
the company a lot of problems. He said the line could never be worked out and
was eventually abandoned. He said the line was a black hole and felt the
company needed to expand operations with China instead and that outsourcing
began in 2004-05.
Swyers said Automotive Coordinates was set
up to develop a line of seat organizers, blankets, CD cases and key fobs and
they sold to K-Mart. He said the LLC named OEM was created to supply carpeted
floor mats to Ford to be sold through dealerships. He said he had seen company letterhead
from Harris Components. Swyers said he did not know anything about the LLCs
named White Oak, CBM Sales, Davis, Polar, Inc., T & T or OMS.
Lisa Moses, Market Manager for Remington,
said the business was hurt significantly by problems with the EVA line, such as
mats melting to vehicles and complaints to retailers like Wal-Mart and Pep
Boys. She said signing a business agreement with an overseas company named TaTa
changed the way Remington did business.
Moses said Harris Components was operated
out of the Remington office with Remington employees but that it had its own
suppliers, products and business cards. She did not know if they filed a
separate tax return because she was not involved with the finances.
Willard Rice testified he was brought into
the company to help develop relationships with Asia. He said Remington needed
to have multiple LLCs so they were able to deal with multiple suppliers and so
that if one product line failed, it would not affect the others.
Rice said the first 10 LLCs all had plans:
CDN sales was trying to develop a line of laminate flooring, CanMark was going
to be for electric polishers, T&T was for 2nd quality flooring,
White Oak was for impact wrenches and Motorworks was for jacks. He said the
idea was to take any successful product lines and make them into their own
company, but none of them were successful. He said he did not have any
knowledge of loans for Harris Components, but that Harris was successful until
their supplier failed.
Rice said he did not know if any of the
LLCs filed a tax return. He said the employees were the same as those for
Remington, but the LLCs were properly formed with proper ID numbers. Rice also
said Mourier was replaced as CFO by Tim Davis at either the end of ’02 or
beginning of ’03 and that it was a requirement for financing from Frontier Bank
that Mourier be replaced.
Rice said he had not heard of any of the 11
companies in the second set of loans.
Thomas Parkes, Tim Parkes’ brother,
testified he worked on T&T for over a year, trying to develop a market for
flooring seconds. He said it was a full-time job for him but he did not receive
any compensation and it was ultimately unsuccessful.
Kent Moore said the LLCs served as holding
companies, and they held debt. He said the term “shell” could mean a company
that has nothing or surrounded something or could mean a holding company. He
said one of the LLCs managed an income stream for all the others.
Moore said he had properly established all
21 LLCs according to state law. He said Parkes initially discussed forming
C-Corporations, but they decided LLCs would be best for tax purposes. Moore
said the LLCs were set up without the clause that released Parkes from any
liability and that Parkes always took responsibility for the loans.
Documents were later brought into evidence
that showed Moore had filed amendments after 2004 that invoked Parkes’
protection, eliminating his financial liability for the LLCs.
Mike Richardson, attorney for Mourier, did
not call any additional witnesses.
Humble called SA Barker back to the stand
as his only rebuttal witness. Barker said a subpoena had been given to Moore
for documents relating to the LLCs, and that the FBI was given documents
relating to their formation but not the documents removing Parkes’ liability. He
said he received those documents on Thursday.
Humble began his closing statements by
pointing out that Parkes’ defense had spent the entire week saying Parkes had
always taken responsibility for the loans, but “Lo and behold on New Year’s
Eve, 2004, he’s off the hook.” He said there was no dispute as to who got the
benefit from the loans and that the victim was the bank itself. He said fraud
was only limited by man’s imagination to do it.
Humble said Remington was not creditworthy
and that made the loans illegal. He said the loans were created before the LLCs
and asked, “Does that sound legitimate?” He said Parkes and Mourier may not
have understood what the FDIC regulations were, but they knew loans could not
be made to Remington. Humble said the debt held in the LLCs allowed Remington
to show $4.25 in equity on their books and they were the only ones benefiting
from it. He said Mourier’s lawyer had done a good job of laying low throughout
the trial but reminded jurors that the two were best friends and had moved here
together.
Parkes’ attorney, David Garvin, said there
was fraud, but the person committing the fraud never stepped foot in the
courtroom. He said Goddard had a habit of breaking bad loans into pieces and
that Parkes was “the patsy of all pasties.”
Garvin said, “Parkes was not a crook, he
was a hero.” He said Parkes was trying to save jobs and that he took
responsibility for the debt. He said Remington was losing money because they
were paying it all to Benton Bank. He said Bancshares was a holding company and
it was proper business to operate without a phone or office.
Garvin said there was no evidence in the
case that Parkes knew what Goddard was doing and that Goddard used the wrong
federal ID numbers on the loans. He said Remington needed the entities to
remove debt off the books and that every penny Remington owed Benton Bank was
paid back.
Garvin said he was reminded of a story
about a little boy trying to throw starfish back into the water when a
hurricane was coming in. He said a man told the boy it was useless to throw the
starfish back in because waves from the storm were just bringing the starfish
back onto the beach and they would die anyway. Garvin said the boy, with tears
in his eyes, held up a starfish and said, “This matters,” and threw in back
into the water. He told the jury Parkes was the starfish, and Goddard was the
hurricane.
Richardson said neither of the men knew
anything about lending limits and the bank was better off because of Remington.
He said when Mourier was asked about “shell” companies, it was a generic
question and anyone would have answered that it was wrong to create shell
companies. He said Mourier always told the truth and acted in good faith and
that there was more than reasonable doubt.
“You will be haunted if you convict Mr.
Mourier,” he told jurors.
Humble closed the case by saying that in
his 29 years on the job he had seldom seen the underhanded things he’d seen in
this case. He asked how Goddard could have come up with the company names if
Parkes had not given them to him. He said the two were in communication,
adding, “How many of ya’ll get an email from your banker when he’s getting an
exam?”